Got a few emails today accusing me of being inconsistent — or of backing off my claim of Monday that U of L should hit the road if it wants games against big-time opponents when today I wrote that U of L officials had little choice but to accept an opener against Murray State or opponent of similar caliber.

No, I’m not backing off my Monday point. If U of L wants to play a big-splash game against a big-time opponent, its quickest route to that is to do it on the road. After now 32 straight regular-season games in which it has been a favorite, at some point a risk is warranted.

I chose to bring up Auburn’s available game in the second week of the season as an example, and said I thought U of L should have jumped at the opportunity to head south. Sure, it would cost money (though Auburn no doubt could pay a guarantee that would recoup a good bit of the lost revenue of a home game).

That’s not U of L’s philosophy, and so be it. I’m paid for my opinion, and I gave it.

But that discussion had nothing to do with the opener and the circumstances surrounding it. I said in Monday’s column that I wish U of L were playing at Auburn in Game 2.

In Game 1, U of L had no choice but to accept a lesser opponent after — well, you know what happened with the state rival and the change in scheduling. Enough said.

Season openers are sensitive for most places. Boy, do we not know that by now? U of L could find no Division I-A schools to fill it, so it took an in-state Division I-AA. Nobody was happy having to do that, least of all the people at U of L. Even some places that would be willing to invite U of L for a one-and-done game at their place (something U of L says it won’t do) have no interest in having the Cardinals as season-opening guests.

The fact is this: U of L had a long-standing practice of playing an SEC opponent on Labor Day weekend. U of L was willing, and in fact preferred, to show up at Commonwealth Stadium and play an SEC opponent in front of a packed house on opening weekend. U of L tried hard to make that happen. So to criticize them when they had to scramble to find an opponent of lesser-quality wouldn’t have been quite fair.

I’m not going to take U of L to task for doing something it basically had to do. But to question whether they ought to hit the road for a big-time opponent or two is very fair, I believe. And I did just that with the Auburn discussion.

And then there’s one more set of emailers who say, “We’re tired of this discussion. Nobody is interested in beating these dead horses.”

Maybe so, but more people are talking about these issues than the games themselves right now, so it seems like a relevant topic to me.

Thanks to all who write, by the way. I try to respond to each email personally, but if for some reason I haven’t, the responses are always welcome, agree with me or not.


7 thoughts on “Consistency

  1. Eric, for the 2nd straight day I will say your excuses and UK-bashing simply does not follow the facts and are not logical. UL has known for TWO YEARS that they will not be opening 2007 in Lexington – TWO YEARS! Isn’t it UL’s responsibility to schedule 12 games Eric, or is it Mitch Barnhart’s? Again I will ask you and hope you finally have an intelligent response, WHO was UL going to play instead of Murray State if they opened this season playing UK? They had to have SOMEBODY on the schedule to play 12 games, right? Hawaii was desparately searching for a game, why didn’t UL schedule them? UL chose to play the WORST team in D-1AA, got lambasted nationally on Friday for doing so, and all you have to defend such nonsence with is to blame UK. Typical UL-fanboy tactics, you have NOTHING intellectually or factually to defend Murray freaking State on your schedule so do what you only know best – blame Big Brother. Shame on you Eric, I am sure your father would expect better quality opinions from you – or at the very least HONEST ones.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: